Good ideas in Trucking fail why


With the recent business venture IdleAire Inc. failing, and going out of business it got me to thinking. Why do good ideas in trucking always seem to fail, or do fail period? We have all seen and heard the listening sessions the FMCSA has been holding recently, they want to change the HOS up, again. Why, must they mess with a good thing? I mean clearly statistics don’t lie, we have seen a decrease in accidents with fatalities. So, why change a good thing that is working?

IdleAir, in my opinion was ahead of its time for sure. They started back in 2000 and fuel wasn’t really that high, yet and we certainly didn’t have the idling restrictions that we have now. That was one reason IdleAir failed. Another reason and I will say this is probably the biggest reason, is the cost. Not that IdleAir was making a killing with the prices they charged obviously because if they were making money why would they have closed?

If the idea of IdleAir would have started later, I believe they might have lasted longer. Now that they have closed, what will the extra 150,000 trucks do? We still have idle restrictions, and more being added seems like every day. Fuel is still pretty high, and that probably never will go back down. These trucking companies, have two options well actually its three options. The first one is to do nothing let the drivers deal with it. This is not going to happen, as drivers would walk away, or at least a few would. I’m sure enough would that a company would be hurting pretty quick.

Second option, is to start putting their drivers in motels of the night or day depending on load schedules. Well I really don’t see this one happening much either, as schedules would conflict, and the driver would end up missing his or her check in time resulting in the hotel giving their room away. Plus, parking would and is a problem, already at hotels. They were not designed to handle tractor and trailers. Cost is another problem, yes generally truckers get a discount for hotels, but if it came down to having to use them all the time, prices are bound to go up.

The third option is, of course APU’s. Auxiliary Power Unit’s that run the electrical side of the truck, without the truck having to idle. It’s like a generator, but is fixed to the truck, and hard-wired into the truck’s electrical system. I think most will keep the batteries on a truck charged as well, or you can use it to charge a battery.

The problem with APU’s is the cost five-thousand and up, some cheaper some higher. Also, one driver I heard talking said with repairs and cost, he might have broken even meaning visible savings for having one. With the cost being so much for these APU’s, and the savings being so little or none at all, companies will not install the APU’s.

The trucking industry is hurting right now, and if something is not done soon, I see a bunch more companies going under. Now with all the rail talk going on, I believe this is for a reason, government wants the rail in and trucking out. But, they will need the trucks anyway, just not as many. And adding more freight to rail, solves the problems of drivers getting their required rest, as there will be no more OTR drivers, it will all be regional home every night. I am pretty sure this is what is coming to trucking. With the implementation of CS2010 which the government says will put 175,000 drivers out of work, and the rail coming in, looks like their plan is working out. So, why do good ideas in trucking fail? It looks like I just answered that question.

© 2010, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

About admin

I'm just a EX-truck driver, trying to pass along a little information. I been in the Trucking Industry as a driver for over 15 years. I have driven both as an owner operator and as a company driver. I have also been a driver instructor for an accredited truck driving school in KY. I am no longer a truck driver, but I consider myself to be a watchdog for the trucking industry. In fact this site is the #1 site for getting the real news about trucking. We don't hold back here, you will hear the full story. Twitter | |Truck Drivers News Facebook
This entry was posted in Truck Driver Industry and tagged , , , , going out of business, , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Good ideas in Trucking fail why

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Good ideas in Trucking fail why « Truck Driver Industry « Truck Drivers News --

  2. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  3. Ethan Garber says:

    Hello TDN,

    I agree with your message. I am against anti-idling laws on a philosophical level, but I can tell you that having strong truck stop partners is critical for success of anti-idling technology. I know from personal experience as watched Idleaire fail and I also helped organize a group (Convoy Solutions) that bought some of Idleaire’s assets out of bankruptcy in February. It has been an incredible struggle to get one of the large chains (TA/Petro) to even talk to us. Although I’m a shareholder in TA and their parent HPT, I have never gotten a call or email back from their head of investor relations. Our goal is to work with partners who want to work with us and who care about the health of drivers and finding ways to save them money. Pilot, Loves, Sapp Brothers – They have all welcomed us back and are working with Convoy to bring this important anti-idling technology back to life.

  4. Pat says:

    cs2010…. I recently encountered a disturbing issue, I was sited for a brake light on my tractor being out however, once I made it to the shop to have the light replaced the mechanic informed me that all lights were working properly. What can I do about this regarding the cs 2010 reporting?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: