The Mexican Trucks are coming! The Mexican Trucks are coming!

While this is not completely true the Secretary of Transportation did release a “Concept Document” that it alleges will serve as a starting point for renewed negotiations with Mexico regarding a potential future cross-border trucking program.

The renewing of the cross-border trucking program – now is wrong on so many levels it is unbelievable that this administration would even consider doing it.

This administration is struggling with creating jobs, but wants to start negotiating with Mexico to reopen the cross-border trucking program that will only rob U.S. truck-drivers of their jobs.

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) has put out a call to action to its more than 150,000 members asking them to contact their Senators and Representatives. To reach your Senators and your Representative in the House, call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121, provide the operator with your home zip code. The operator will connect you with the offices of your elected representatives.

There are many different reasons why a trucking program with Mexico is a bad idea. The following are just a few things that public officials need to know:

  • The burden should be on Mexico to raise the regulatory standards of their trucking industry, not on the U.S. to lower ours or find ways to accommodate their trucking companies and drivers.
  • Every year, U.S. truckers are burdened with new safety, security and environmental regulations. Those regulations come with considerable compliance costs. Mexico-domiciled trucking companies and drivers do not contend with a similar regulatory regime in their home country nor must they contend with the corresponding regulatory compliance costs that burden U.S. truckers.
  • To date Mexico has failed to institute regulations and enforcement programs that are even remotely similar to those in the United States.
  • To ensure the safety and security of U.S. citizens, Mexico-domiciled trucking companies and truck drivers must be required to comply with the same level of safety, security and environmental standards that already apply to U.S.-based companies and drivers, NOT ONLY WHILE OPERATING IN THE U.S. BUT ALSO IN THEIR HOME COUNTRY.
  • Without a level playing field with Mexico, thousands of U.S. jobs will be lost if a cross-border trucking program is initiated at this time.
  • There is more information located on OOIDA’s website about who to contact and how to go about doing it.

    The top, experienced Mexican drivers make 13 cents per mile and a $20 per Diem. You would be kidding yourself if you think a large scale pilot program won’t significantly affect you as a US truck-driver. At the very least it will bring down rates, but it will also very likely impact the availability of loads as shippers and brokers move towards the significantly reduced transportation costs that Mexican truckers will offer.

    “Mexico has been bullying our government into allowing their trucking companies to have full access to highways across the U.S. while refusing to raise regulatory standards in its own trucking industry,” Spencer continued. “Mexico’s regulatory standards aren’t even remotely equivalent to what we have in the U.S.”

    “Every year, U.S. truckers are burdened with new safety, security and environmental regulations. Those regulations come with considerable compliance costs,” said Spencer. “Mexico-domiciled trucking companies do not contend with a similar regime nor must they contend with the corresponding costs.”

    If you as a US truck-driver value your job then you must contact your Senators and Representatives and explain to them why this is not a good idea.

    It’s odd to see the DOT always talking about how their number one priority is Safety and then they release this idea.

    © 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts:

Posted in trucking news | Tagged bad idea, , , concept document, , , , House Call, , , many different reasons, , , , , owner operator, , regulatory compliance costs, , regulatory standards, , , , , trucking program | 1 Comment

OOIDA and Truckers React to DOT’s Mexican Trucking Proposal

The largest trade association representing truckers reacted to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s announced intention to lay the groundwork for a program to open American roads to trucking companies from Mexico.

“With so much focus in Washington on creating jobs, it’s a bit shocking that the administration would pursue a program that can only rob U.S. drivers of their jobs,” said Todd Spencer, Executive Vice-President of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.

“While we appreciate that the administration is proposing to allow Congress and the public to weigh in on a future trucking program with Mexico, they seem to be missing the main issue at hand,” continued Spencer. “The onus is upon Mexico to raise their regulatory standards, not on the U.S. to lower ours to accommodate their trucking industry.”

OOIDA contends that to ensure the safety and security of U.S. citizens, Mexico-domiciled trucking companies and truck drivers must be required to comply with the same level of safety, security and environmental standards that apply to their U.S.-based counterparts, not only while they are operating in the U.S., but also in their home country. To date, Mexico has failed to institute regulations and enforcement programs that are even slightly similar to those in the United States.

“Mexico has been bullying our government into allowing their trucking companies to have full access to highways across the U.S. while refusing to raise regulatory standards in its own trucking industry,” Spencer continued. “Mexico’s regulatory standards aren’t even remotely equivalent to what we have in the U.S.”

“Every year, U.S. truckers are burdened with new safety, security and environmental regulations. Those regulations come with considerable compliance costs,” said Spencer. “Mexico-domiciled trucking companies do not contend with a similar regime nor must they contend with the corresponding costs.”

OOIDA notes that the primary objective of NAFTA is to ensure the North American nations enjoy the prosperity that would result from the free flow of goods across borders. In order to achieve this end, the agreement seeks to ensure that each country affords the others access to economic opportunity. OOIDA contends that under current conditions in Mexico there is little opportunity or willingness on the
part of U.S. truckers to compete there.

“Until the Mexican government is able to significantly diminish the rampant crime and violence within its borders, commits to addressing its deteriorated infrastructure, and promulgates regulations that significantly improve its trucking industry, U.S. truckers will be unable to benefit from the anticipated reciprocity,” said Spencer. “If a new cross-border trucking program were implemented in the near future, U.S. truckers would be forced to forfeit their own economic opportunities while companies and drivers from Mexico, free from equivalent regulatory burdens, take over their traffic lanes.”

© 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in trucking news | Tagged , american roads, , , , , , groundwork, , Issue At Hand, , , , owner operator, regulatory standards, , safety security, , , , , , , trucking program, | Leave a comment

Women In Trucking Association and Navistar Partner to Honor Trucking’s most Influential Women

The Women In Trucking Association and Navistar Inc have created an annual award to honor the trucking industry’s most influential woman. The inaugural award will be given at a reception to be held during the Truckload Carriers Association conference in San Diego, Calif., on March 15, 2011.

“We are excited to be able to honor a woman who has been influential in the trucking industry,” said Ellen Voie, President/CEO of Women In Trucking. “This award will further our mission to celebrate the success already evidenced by those have led us through a very male dominated career environment.”

“Women lead the trucking industry in many different roles,” said Anne Belec, Chief Marketing Officer, Navistar Inc. “This award is designed to shine a spotlight on some of that great leadership in hopes of inspiring other women to join our industry.”

Award candidates are defined as women who make or influence key decisions in a corporate, manufacturing, supplier, owner-operator, driver, sales or dealership setting. The individual must have a proven record of responsibility and mentored or served as a role model to other women in the industry. The woman does not have to currently hold the position for which her work is nominated, but she must be a living individual.

Nominations are now being accepted for this award and must be submitted before the January 31, 2011 deadline. Judges for the award will be Howard Abramson; Transport Topics Publisher, Tom Nightingale; Chief Marketing Officer, Con-way, Inc. and Anne Belec. More information about the award can be found at www.womenintrucking2011.org

The reception will follow a panel discussion to focus on issues women face in the trucking industry and how some of these challenges are being addressed. Panelists include Anne Ferro, Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Tom O’Brien, President, President TA/Petro Travel Centers. Phyllis Cochran, President, Parts Division, Navistar, Inc. and Val Liese, President, Jack Jones Trucking and former Chairwoman of the California Trucking Association.

Chris Burruss, President,Truckload Carriers Association, will moderate the panel. Additional information about the Truckload Carriers Association conference

Navistar International Corporation (NYSE: NAV) is a holding company (www.navistar.com.) whose subsidiaries and affiliates produce International® brand commercial and military trucks, MaxxForce® brand diesel engines, IC Bus™ brand school and commercial buses, Monaco® RV brands of recreational vehicles, and Workhorse® brand chassis for motor homes and steps vans. It also is a private-label
designer and manufacturer of diesel engines for the pickup truck, van and SUV markets. The company also provides truck and diesel engine service parts. Another affiliate offers financing services.

Women In Trucking Association (www.WomenInTrucking.org) was established to encourage the employment of women in the trucking industry, promote their accomplishments and minimize obstacles faced by women working in the trucking industry.

© 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Women in trucking | Tagged , , career environment, carriers, Chief Marketing Officer, , , , influential women, , , Navistar, , , , , , travel centers, , , , , , Women Face | Leave a comment

Distracted Driving – Should be the same for ALL Drivers

The Department of Transportation Secretary has been working to ‘fight’ distracted driving ever since taking the position within the DOT. And he is succeeding in getting laws passed that I feel are just “feel good” legislation’s by individual states that have enacted the laws.

The problem I have with the laws against distracted driving is the punishment and fine differences, and the fact that this law is borderline invasion of privacy. Kentucky adopted the rule last year, but January 01, 2011 they began to enforce the said laws. Anyone caught using a cell phone to text while driving on roads across the Commonwealth of Kentucky could be hit with a $25 fine. “You could treat it like a traffic stop to where you could ask them for consent to search. And if they give you consent to search, and you see their phone and you talk to them about it…and yeah, they come up with it. It’s going to be difficult at first.” Kentucky trooper Walter Szczepan said.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued a ban on sending and receiving and reading of text or email messages for Commercial drivers. For any violations by CMV drivers or employers of the requirements adopted in this final rule, civil penalties may be imposed on drivers, in an amount up to $2,750, and on employers, in an amount up to $11,000.

I first want to say that I believe that all texting and driving, cell phone usage while driving and distracted driving in general is very dangerous but people should have common sense about when to do it. Just because a new law goes into effect doesn’t mean we are all safer on the roads. But my point is if there is a law then the fines or punishments should be the same for everyone. It makes no difference if a 2-ton car hits a person or if a 40-ton truck hits a person both of them traveling at 55-mph that person is more than likely dead.

I am going to post a video provided by a North Texas Tollway Authority traffic camera, back in May 2010 of a Pepsi truck driving in the southbound lanes at Beltline Road that afternoon when a car obviously cuts the truck off or something. By the way there were no serious injuries in this accident.

[stream provider=video flv=x:/truckdriversnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Caught-on-tape_-18-wheeler-crashes-on-Tollway-_-wfaa.com-_-Dallas-Fort-Worth-Local-News1.mp4 img=x:/truckdriversnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/truckwrecked-150x150.png embed=false share=false width=450 height=253 dock=true controlbar=over bandwidth=high autostart=false /]

Now, I am not sure if this car driver was texting or talking or even using a cell phone at the time of the accident, I am just using the video to prove a point that I have about these texting and cell phone laws.

In the video you can clearly see that the truck is under control by the driver. Its not weaving and is centered in its lane of travel. Now the car drifts into the truck causing the truck to go over the concrete wall into oncoming traffic. But what if in doing so that truck killed two or three people in the other lanes?

But remember the car caused this accident.

What if that truck driver was found he or she was using a cell phone at the time of the accident? Because if there had been any fatalities I guarantee you cell phone records would be looked at.

Now this truck driver could be charged the $2750.00 plus he or she could very well be charged with vehicular manslaughter and his company charged $11,000.00 plus the offense could be classified as a “serious” violation in 393.51.

That would mean the truck driver if convicted of the texting or talking prohibition along with second “serious” offense in a three-year period, would be disqualified from operating a commercial vehicle for 60 days. All because the car caused the entire accident. But the cars punishment would be anywhere from a slap on the wrist or it could be a fine up to $500.00.

Because we all have seen it too many times before, if a tractor-trailer is involved in an accident very seldom is the trucks driver not charged with the accident. Not because the driver was at fault, but because of money – trucking companies pay out big money for accidents. And this law opens the door even wider for this type of thing.

My point is the truck driver technically was breaking the law, BUT from the video we clearly see the car driver caused the accident. But the truck’s driver could technically be charged in this situation as well. And to me that is not fair. If there is a law and all drivers have to respect that law – then the punishments and or fines SHOULD be the same for all.

© 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Educating the Public – Tips for Driving around Tractor Trailers

I thought we would try to start 2011 off the right way.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Federal Motor Carrier Association (FMCSA) along with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) all seem to think that adding more regulations to the already very long list in trucking are needed.

These people who work at these jobs don’t have an inkling of what needs to be done. So they do the only thing they know how to do – add more regulations.

DOT, FMCSA, and NHTSA seem to think that because there were 5,500 deaths supposedly caused by distracted driving, that the most safest group of drivers on the highways are to blame – truck-drivers. So, the DOT, FMCSA, and NHTSA are all trying to abolish the use of cell phones in tractor-trailers. Cutting the sometimes only way of communications a trucker has with his company about his job. The fines are unbelievable for cell phone usage that they have set forth on the trucking industry – but allow the general motoring public minimal fines.

DOT, FMCSA, and NHTSA seem to be ignoring the fact that tractor-trailer crash-related fatalities are down by one-third from their 2003 levels, and that fatality and injury crash rates are at their lowest level since the DOT began keeping records. In the “real facts” that the DOT, FMCSA, and NHTSA tend to over-look, 80-percent of tractor-trailer Vs general motoring public accidents, the truckers are NOT found to be at fault.

With that being said, I want to do the DOT, FMCSA, and the NHTSA’s job for them and try to educate the general motoring public with some tips for driving in and around tractor-trailers.

Before I start with some tips, let’s look at a tractor-trailer. They are very big and long, nearly 75-feet or more in length, generally speaking and legally they can weigh up to 80,000-pounds, but some states allow for more weight but generally speaking 80,000-pounds is the limit. Most tractor-trailers have five axles that means on each axles wheel there is a brake that’s two sets of brakes per axle, BUT this doesn’t mean tractor-trailers can stop on a dime.

During normal weather and with a fully loaded tractor-trailer traveling at 55-mph it will take approximately 400-feet to safely stop – to picture what 400-feet is look at a football field that is 100-yards long or 300-feet. Add bad weather and this increases dramatically. So, the old saying that the trucks have more wheels, and brakes they should be able to stop quicker – is NOT TRUE.

  • TIP#1: Do NOT pull out in front of any tractor-trailers just sit and wait that extra couple of seconds – it won’t kill you – but pulling out in front of them could.
  • TIP#2: Do NOT dead stop in front of any tractor-trailer – or you could be dead.
  • While driving around within cities were there are turns to be made, a lot of accidents occur when tractor-trailers try to make turns – especially right turns. Most tractor-trailers have to make very wide right hand turns – so generally they will move over to the left to make right hand turns. The accident occurs when impatient people try to go around the truck on the right hand side and try to make the turn before the truck. The right-side of a tractor-trailer is the hardest side for the driver to see.
    Here is an example of a right hand accident while making a turn:

  • TIP#3: Do NOT attempt to go around a truck on the right-side ever – more accidents happen on the right-side of a tractor-trailer because of blind-spots located around the truck. Do NOT be impatient – or you could become a doctor’s patient.
  • Speaking of blind-spots around a truck this brings me to tip#4 but first let me explain what a blind-spot is. A blind-spot in a vehicle are areas around the vehicle that cannot be directly observed under existing circumstances. Blind-spots exist in a wide range of vehicles: cars, pick-up trucks, tractor-trailers, buses, motorboats and aircraft.
    For tractor-trailers here is an example – stay out of the NO ZONES:

  • TIP#4: Do NOT drive in or around the NO ZONES located around tractor-trailers. This tip will save your life – learn it and obey it.
  • This brings me to talking about driving in and around tractor-trailers while on the interstate. In the many years I was out on the road I have seen many accidents and many “near misses” and usually it is some simple mistake that causes the accidents. First off I would like to say that NOT ALL tractor-trailer drivers are perfect drivers the trucking industry is full of nitwits who drive for a living. But the majority of all the truck drivers are professional and drive really well.

    While traveling on interstates I have seen cars that want to ride right beside tractor-trailers this is a very dangerous act and should be avoided when you can do so safely. See a lot of people ride in that lane right beside the tractor-trailers and never think of a tire exploding on the truck or a brake drum disintegrating on that truck. Where do you suppose when the tire explodes the pieces of the tire go? Where do you suppose when that brake drum explodes the “shrapnel” goes?

    A average tractor-trailer 18/32″ rib tire in the 295/75R22.5 size, would have an overall weight of around 110 lbs. So, jetting along at 65-mph a tire weighing 110-lbs blows out and a huge piece called a “gator” flies off – if it hits your car – trust me it will cause damage if not kill you if it came through a windshield.

    A brake drum can weigh more than 100-lbs. when it explodes and they do “shrapnel” is sent out from under the truck in all directions. What causes brake drums to explode? When a tractor-trailer driver applies the brakes this causes friction between the brake pad and the brake drum. Friction or heat can cause the drum to crack which in turn would cause a drum to explode. Does this happen very often? No, but it is a possibility, just the same as a dual set of wheels can and have come off tractor-trailers before.

  • TIP#5: Do not ride beside tractor-trailers or right behind tractor-trailers, pay attention at all times while driving around tractor-trailers.
  • Example of what happens when a tractor-trailer tire explodes and you get hit by the “gator.”

    Example of what happens when a wheel assembly comes off a tractor-trailer and you happen to be the one that gets hit by it – unfortunately a person was killed in this example.

    I want to end this post by saying that these are just a few of the tips for driving around tractor-trailers hopefully some of the truck drivers who read this post will chime in on some more good tips for the general motoring public. I would have to say that these five tips I have given you will help you to avoid from getting into life threatening situations. If more truck drivers don’t chime in with more tips in the comment section, then I will write a follow-up article containing more tips.

    I am pretty sure that educating the general motoring public will have more effect towards reducing accidents than adding more regulations. I would hope that the DOT, FMCSA, and the NHTSA would give more thoughts to preventing accidents through educating instead of by adding more non-needed regulations. To sum it up what I have written today:

  • TIP#1: Do NOT pull out in front of any tractor-trailers just sit and wait that extra couple of seconds – it won’t kill you – but pulling out in front of them could.
  • TIP#2: Do NOT dead stop in front of any tractor-trailer – or you could be dead.
  • TIP#3: Do NOT attempt to go around a truck on the right-side ever – more accidents happen on the right-side of a tractor-trailer because of blind-spots located around the truck. Do NOT be impatient – or you could become a doctor’s patient.
  • TIP#4: Do NOT drive in or around the NO ZONES located around tractor-trailers. This tip will save your life – learn it and obey it.
  • TIP#5: Do NOT ride beside tractor-trailers or right behind tractor-trailers, pay attention at all times while driving around tractor-trailers.
  • © 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry | Tagged axles, Crash Rates, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Apply Within

We have went another year, now it is 2011.

Are you ready to let your voice be heard?

This site is the ranked in the top 5 on Google usually #1 spot for keywords like truck driver news out of 12,100,000 results.

If I can get a few good bloggers, then it would rank #1 all the time, plus the site can be added to Google news too.

I would like to find a few more guest bloggers who are not afraid to speak their mind when it comes to issues about trucking or how our government is doing wrong.

If that is something you think that you could or would like to do then use the contact page on this site and send me a message.

If you just want to write your post as a text document like MS word then you can use the contact page and send me a message with your email and I will get back to you. Understand that this is not a paying job – although it could turn into one at some point in time. Rules are simple, keep the language at a PG level, and no porn images or nudity. Also, I am not perfect with grammar so you don’t have to be either, but do try to get the spelling right.

© 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry, trucking news | Tagged bloggers, , driver news, Email, , , , ms word, , nudity, pg level, point in time, , rank 1, , Spelling, text document, , , , | Leave a comment

Keeping a Watchful Eye on the Trucking Industry

As another year has passed us by, I will continue to act as a “watchdog” for the trucking industry.

Last year was an unbelievable year for nonsensical rules and regulations that were forced upon the trucking industry.

I wonder what this year will bring about?

Last year Truck Drivers News pointed out some of the most outrageous spending sprees that I have ever seen by the Department of Transportation.

It’s hard to believe that we actually pay the Secretary of Transportation $163,000.00 per year to waste billions of dollars on foolish, imprudent ideas. I am hoping that the power switch off in the house will cap this free-flowing money gusher that this administration is using.

Billions of dollars were wasted this past year, but none of the problems in trucking were fixed. All this “stimulus money” was used for all these construction projects but yet there is still a shortage of safe parking places for truck drivers. Instead of training requirements for new truck drivers, the DOT and the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration decided banning cell phone use and speed limiters are needed.

Instead of safe and plentiful parking areas for truckers the DOT allowed for closure of many state rest areas “claiming” no money to operate them. But yet the DOT “gave” billions of dollars away for bicycle paths or lanes. Bicyclist don’t pay any road taxes to maintain these lanes – everyone else who uses the road pays for these lanes with truckers paying the most.

More than 26%, or one in four, of the nation’s bridges are either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. But the Obama administration spent billions and plans on many more billions on “high-speed rail.” So why are we worried so much about HSR? Trucks are the single most-used mode to move freight, especially for distances less than 500 miles – they moved 69% of the weight and 65% of the value according to the most recent report – 2007.

Early part of 2010 FMCSA held listening sessions so that drivers if they wanted to could weigh in on the proposed hours-of-service rule changes and tell FMCSA the need for flexibility in the work day to take needed rest breaks. On Dec. 23, the FMCSA issued a regulatory proposal that would revise HOS requirements for commercial truck drivers – requirements that have gone through multiple changes and sparked numerous legal challenges since 2004.

FMCSA’s latest proposal would require all commercial drivers to complete all driving within a 14-hour workday and to finish all on-duty work activities within a 13-hour window. The agency said the new proposal would keep a “34-hour restart” provision allowing drivers to resume their 60 to 70 hour shifts after taking off 34 consecutive hours. OOIDA has it outlined pretty well of what the changes consist of here.

FMCSA’s 2008 estimates that reducing drive time by one hour and changing the driver start provision would cost the industry an additional $2.2 billion per year. They have also gone on record stating that eliminating the extra 11th hour of driving time would not be cost-effective and would have no material effect on safety.

The proposed rule requires a driver to include two overnight periods – between midnight and 6 a.m. – it will be impossible for most drivers to achieve a restart in 34 hours. The proposed rules ignore the fact that crash-related fatalities are down by one-third from their 2003 levels, and that fatality and injury crash rates are at their lowest level since the Department of Transportation began keeping records.

But this is normally how the DOT works they refuse to see REAL statistics that say DOT’s claims are false. They would rather get incredulous reports that are ridiculous at best – but agree with DOT’s intentions. So hop on board with the number one site that will tell it like it is and keep you informed on the latest BS moves by supposedly “leaders of the industry.” I’m guessing 2011 will be no different mainly because Obama is still president and we have too many Ray LaHood’s in power.

© 2011, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry, trucking news | Tagged , , , construction projects, , , , , , , , , , , safety administration, , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

E-logs: My first impression by Todd McCann

I would like to thank @ToddMcCann for giving me the permission to repost this article. As always, he has done an excellant job with getting the information out.

Despite the fact that I’ve been driving for 13 years, I made a bonehead rookie mistake yesterday.

It was especially unfortunate since it probably would have been covered if it didn’t coincide with my first day running with e-logs. But first…

what are e-logs?

E-logs are electronic logs. For more details, you may want to jump on over to a previous blog of mine before you read on.

I gave it the appropriate name of, ”Fear and loathing of electronic logs.”  As my truck was getting e-logs installed, I was taking a class on how to use them.

I went in grumpy and hating them. Four hours later, I came out with a slightly less grumpy disposition and a lower hate factor, but I’m still not doing round-off-double-back-handsprings. And thank God for that. I wouldn’t want you to see my cheer-leading panties.

One thing I knew going in was that each company can set up e-logs according to their own guidelines. This is something that @DeanAllen2006 had informed me of in the blog post mentioned above. Knowing my company, this was what I was most worried about. My worries weren’t unfounded.

For example, Dean’s company has their e-logs set up where he can creep along (7 mph or less) in rush hour traffic and still be on the “On-Duty, Not Driving” line. My company has it set to go to the Driving line after a half-mile, no matter what your speed is. It used to be set at 1 mile, but they decided that was waaaay too long. Grrr. Keep this under your hat, but I think mine is still set at 1 mile. Shhhhhh.

When they mentioned this in class, all three of us drivers started talking at once. Our concern was this. Many times we’ll be parked at a shipper/receiver waiting for a dock. Or maybe we got there the night before. Either way, if it’s going to be a while, we’ll start our 10-hour break. At some point, we’re going to have to wake up and back into a dock. Now there are a lot of massive warehouses out there. Some even have off-site buildings. Many of them will require us to drive over .5 mile to get to the dock. That will effectively break our mandatory 10-hour rest period.

The company is aware of this and is looking into it. For now the fix is to call in to the Safety Department and let them know what happened. If they can verify you never left the property, they’ll fix it. While it’s good that they’ll do that, it’s a big fail in my book. Still stranger, I’m thinking they wouldn’t even have this problem if they’d just left the 1 mile limit in effect. Although that still wouldn’t fix the off-site problem…

Next, I asked about a situation that happened to me not long ago. I had enough hours to get to my delivery location, but they didn’t have any parking. My plan was to park at a nearby Lowe’s that I had been parking at for years. Since I didn’t have enough time to fit in a 10-hour break before my delivery appointment, I was just going to drive the 5 miles from Lowe’s to the customer and show on my paper logs that I had been at the delivery point all night. Illegal? Technically, yes. Done frequently by truckers? Definitely yes. Able to do on e-logs? Nope.

That was my plan anyway. What actually happened is a tow truck driver knocked on my door and told me he was instructed to tow any truck that wouldn’t leave the Lowe’s parking lot. Naturally, I left. Here’s the thing though. I was about 7.5 hours into my break. If I had been down 8 hours I could have used it as part of a split sleeper berth, moved, and gotten my other 2 hours somewhere else. Since it wasn’t, I moved, pretended I didn’t, and delivered my load on time.

But that was only possible because I was on paper logs. I asked the trainer about this scenario and was told that since I didn’t have any hours available, and I had to move before my 10-hour break was completed, I would be charged with a log violation. She did say that the company would note the situation along with the violation so that it could be seen that I had no choice in the matter. While this sucks more than a dehydrated mosquito, that’s not the worst of it.

Since I had moved before completing my 10-hour break and I hadn’t even gotten 8 hours in to set up a possible split sleeper berth, I would now have to start my break over. So now my mandatory 10-hour break has just turned into a mandatory 17.5 hour break (that’s my wasted 7.5 hours that didn’t count, plus my new 10-hour break). Furthermore, I’m sitting 5 miles from my delivery point, but I now can’t deliver because I don’t have any driving time. In this situation, another driver would have to come and deliver my load. 

The trainer said the fix for this problem was to plan ahead. If you know that a receiver doesn’t have parking, tell your dispatcher how close you can get and they’ll find another driver to relay the load. This is going to lead to a LOT of relays, especially since my company doesn’t always know which customers allow parking, and which don’t. Even crappier is that many times you can get within the same city as the receiver, you just can’t park at their facility. Since my company doesn’t pay a dime for local runs (within the same city), many of these runs won’t pay anything except for the miles it takes you to get to the relay point.

While all this sounds easy enough, what about those situations like the one I was in? I’d been parking at that Lowe’s for years. How was I to know they’d change the rules all of a sudden? Or how about those times when you park somewhere questionable because you’ve run out of driving time? Truckers are forced to move all the time for reasons such as this. Who gets stuck with the log violation, the ticket if we get caught, and possibly a service failure if the load can’t be delivered on time? Once again, it all comes back to the driver.

Here’s the next thing that didn’t make sense. Any calls to breakdown must be done during On-Duty time. So say you pull into a truck stop, do your walk-around, and notice a flat tire. You call into breakdown while you’re still On-Duty, then you check into the shop at the truck stop. They say it’ll be about 3 hours before they can fit you in. That’s fine, I’ll just go to sleep until then, get my 2 hours of my split sleeper berth in, and finish the other 8 hours after I’m out of the shop. Right? Wrong.

The new e-log rules say that when you are awaiting repairs, you have to log it as On-Duty time. So not only are you wasting time that could be going toward your 10-hour break, you’re also using up your hours on your 70-hour work week. Can someone please explain to me how this is any different from moving on a customer’s property to bump a dock? Cuz my e-log trainer couldn’t.

One thing I was anticipating was for them to say how much time e-logs would save me. It came as expected. She said, “Using paper logs, you have to log 15 minutes for fueling, even if it only takes you 5 minutes. Now, if it takes you 5 minutes, it saves you 10 full minutes of driving time!” To which I responded: “But isn’t logging 15 minutes for fueling a company policy?” It was. “Federal guidelines say that anything under 7 minutes doesn’t have to be logged, other than flagging it. So, in essence, we’re losing 15 minutes, because under DOT rules, we wouldn’t even have to show fueling if it only took 5 minutes.” No good answer followed.

Next was the mandatory Pre-Trip Inspection. 15 minutes minimum is the standard for both carriers and the DOT. As I happily pointed out, “Here’s another 15 minutes lost. Before, I could log my PTI when I fueled, no matter what time of day it was. Now you’re telling me I have to do it at the beginning of the day, and it can’t be combined with any other activity.” Again. No explanation.

Now back to my rookie mistake. I got my load information and wrote it all down. For some reason, my brain decided that my delivery time of 1300 (1 p.m.) was actually 3 p.m. I don’t know how that happened. I’m guessing the “3″ in 1300 stuck in my demented brain. Anyway, here’s how e-logs affected this situation.

Since I got this load information the day before and I didn’t want to sit around and wait, I had already asked if I could deliver early. No one would respond to my dispatcher, so I never got an answer. Now if I had been on paper logs, I no doubt would’ve taken off extra early and tried to deliver before my appointment time. If the customer would’ve taken me early, all would be well. If they wouldn’t take me until my appointment time, I would’ve simply showed taking off a couple of hours later on my logs. Again, illegal? Yep. Done by truckers every day? No doubt.

Instead, I waited until the very last minute to take off. I knew that the second I rolled out, my 14-hour clock started ticking. If I rolled out too early and couldn’t deliver, I’d have burned all that time while I sat waiting on my appointment. I wasn’t going to do that. The problem was, I only left in time to deliver by 3 p.m. When my dispatcher called to ask me why I wasn’t heading toward my delivery, I knew I had screwed the pooch.

I had planned on rolling in by 3 p.m. Now I was going to be 2 hours late. Luckily, I have a cool dispatcher who knows I don’t make rookie mistakes like that very often. It was also lucky that there was heavy fog out that she could blame my lateness on. I’m telling you folks, I’ve got the coolest dispatcher. Still, if everyone on e-logs is trying to maximize their time, it seems to me that it will put a whole lot of truckers in a race against time. Does anyone think that’s a good idea?

So now that my first day with e-logs is completed, here’s my initial impression. They are fairly easy to learn and use. It has some cool features that I didn’t have before, such as a running total of my hours, always knowing what city/state I’m in, and it automatically knowing when I arrive at a customer.
While all of that is great, the ability to search and read messages while I’m driving is my favorite feature.

My old Qualcomm unit wouldn’t let me read a message unless I was at a complete stop. They say that I still can’t type while I’m going down the road, which is to be expected. Again, I think they forgot to disable this feature in my unit, because I’ve tried typing while going down the road and it works just dandy. Of course, I’m not planning to abuse this, but still… shhhhhhh.

I’m convinced that the trucking industry is going to have to change if e-logs are going to work. Shippers and Receivers in particular are going to have to start caring about a trucker’s time. And if some of the new proposed rules, such as the hard 14-hour workday take hold, it will be even more necessary. I just don’t think e-logs are quite ready for the weird situations that truckers find themselves in every day.
To sum up, I think the key isn’t the e-logs themselves. The key is how they’re set up. E-logs can be as flexible as a double-jointed gymnast or as rigid as an Eskimo’s clothesline laundry. Here’s to hoping that trucking companies prefer leotards over stiff boxer shorts.

© 2010, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry, trucking news | Tagged 13 Years, back handsprings, , Cheer Leading, Dean, , excellant job, , , God, half mile, , , mccann, , Panties, , , , , , Shhhhhh, shipper receiver, , Worries | 3 Comments

2010: A Year to Forget

Wow, what a year 2010 has been and I for one am glad it has come and is almost gone.

I think 2010 should go down in history as the year of the most idiotic rules and regulations that have ever been brought upon trucking in general.

Not to mention they were forced upon trucking with no real evidence that the “problems” even existed.

But hey that is exactly how Obama and his cronies want it, right? This administration likes to push things onto the people in the US without due process or without thinking things through.

I have come to the conclusion that trucking and politics are a lot alike. We have people who “claim” to be “trucking advocates” and want to help truckers, but in reality, they are just doing it for the fame and or money.

We all remember the collapse of Arrow Trucking December 09′ it lingered on for a few months, and still every once in a while something will come up about it. It was the first time that I ever saw the trucking industry family come together as one, but it also brought out the worse in some people too. Truck Writers of North America named – the Land Line staff – print, Web and radio – for their efforts to assist Arrow Trucking drivers with the first-ever “Extra Mile” award given at the Mid-American Trucking Show. Some other people got a little “upset and acted like children” throwing a “hissy-fit” because they didn’t get mentioned too.

2010 we all “learned” that there is corruption within the trucking industry – it always has had it – this is not something new as some would seem to think so. Just the same we all learned of the wide spread parking shortages. We also saw that the USDOT is more concerned about adding new cell phone laws and messing with regulations that already work – but DOT wants to “redo” the regulations – without looking into the “problem.” The USDOT and FMCSA think adding new regulations that are both unproven and unsafe will improve the problems that are very real in the trucking industry.

What they fail to do is to look at what is causing the very real problems in the trucking industry. The people in the US pay the US DOT Secretary’s annual salary of $163,300.00 for what? All this man wants to do is fight his “dream of distracted driving” in which his “claims” have been dis-proven several times. Why is this man paid so much money to “chase dreams?” This man has wasted billions of dollars on bicycle paths and walking paths – but gave $6 million dollars for “new or upgraded” truck parking – only after giving $5 million to a New Jersey City for one bicycle path.

I don’t really feel like going back through the year 2010 to show all the misuses of money by this man – you can search them yourself start in January 2010 right here. When is enough going to be enough? These government people who from reading their statements know nothing about what troubles truck drivers face daily. They allow all these advocate “safety” groups who are not associated with trucking to make up these ludicrous laws and then they apply them – sometimes without due process periods.

Just a word of warning to the “general motoring public” if these new hours-of-service regulations go into affect beware of the sleepy truck driver beside you or behind you while you are traveling. The USDOT and the FMCSA “claim” these new regulations will help to get rid of the “fatigued” truck driver. They would help if these truck drivers actually had a place they could park. Rest areas get closed – taking available parking places away – and the USDOT adds new cell phone laws to fix the problem. These states closing these rest areas “claim” to have no money to keep them open – but the USDOT gives $5 million dollars to a city to build ONE bicycle path?

This country is being run in the ground by idiots in the White House because their “wants list” looks much more appealing than their “needs list”. They have mixed the two list up, and wasted billions of dollars on some rather illogical projects that were on their “wants list.” If this country is to succeed then they had better get that “needs list” out and start working on those projects.

By the way I want to wish everyone a very happy and prosperous and healthy New Year!

© 2010, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry, trucking news | Tagged , , , , , , collapse, conclusion, , , Dot Regulations, , fame, hissy fit, , , , , , , truck writers, , , , | 2 Comments

Speed Limiters are Unproven and Unsafe – ‘Big Trucking’ Disagrees

An announcement to consider speed limiting heavy trucks to 68 mph has small business truckers wondering why this unproven science is moving forward while minimum training standards for drivers are still not on the books.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration agreed to initiate a rule-making today based on pleas from big trucking entities even though there is no data to support any safety benefits to speed limiting trucks.

“Speed limiting a truck at 68 miles per hour, or at any other speed, will not improve highway safety,” said Todd Spencer, executive vice president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA). “All credible highway research shows that highways are safest when all vehicles travel at the same speed and that different speeds for cars and trucks actually increase the likelihood of accidents.”

A study conducted by the University of Arkansas showed that speed limit differences between trucks and cars increase speed differentials, which create more dangerous interactions between trucks and cars. Also, a study conducted by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute shows that speed limited trucks are overrepresented in rear-end fatalities involving large trucks. Only 4% of all trucks are speed limited, yet half of the rear-end fatalities involving trucks were with speed-limited trucks.

Notably, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s large truck crash causation study showed that there were no fatalities in crashes above 70 mph.

OOIDA contends that economics and the current per-mile pay structure for drivers is the real motivation to reduce the ability of trucks to go with the flow of traffic.

“Hiring the most experienced drivers and paying them professional wages isn’t a priority for most large motor carriers and it’s cheaper to just govern the engine,” Spencer said. “This isn’t a safety measure NHTSA is proposing” added Spencer. “It’s a permission slip for big trucking companies to remain unaccountable.”

Currently, there are no regulations requiring any training whatsoever in order to obtain a commercial drivers license or CDL, even though there is a proposed rule that has been pending for years with the FMCSA.

Thanks to OOIDA for keeping up with the fight!

© 2010, Truck Drivers News Blog. All rights reserved.

Related Posts:

Posted in Truck Driver Industry, trucking news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments